Quarterly figures reported this week record 37,300 new loans advanced to older borrowers in the second quarter — up 13.4 per cent on the same quarter a year earlier, and worth £6.2bn, a rise of 20.5 per cent by value. The data is UK Finance’s, and was reported on 27 August by the trade title Credit Connect.
That is the growth line, and it is the one that travels. The lines underneath it move differently.
Two specialist products inside one total
On the same figures, 5,730 new lifetime mortgages were advanced in the quarter — down 1.7 per cent year on year, though up 8 per cent on the first quarter of 2026 — with a value of £490mn. Retirement interest-only mortgages accounted for 323 advances, up 5.9 per cent, worth £31mn, itself up 24 per cent by value.
Set against a £6.2bn total, the lifetime-mortgage portion is modest, and by volume it did not grow against the same quarter last year. “Later life lending” is a bucket. It holds ordinary residential borrowing by people past a certain age alongside the specialist products, and residential later life loans came to 7.8 per cent of all residential loans in the quarter, buy-to-let later life loans to 20.6 per cent of all buy-to-let loans.
None of that makes the 13.4 per cent wrong. It makes it a statement about a category rather than about equity release, and the two get retold as though they were the same sentence.
The number the figures do not contain
Volume tells a reader what other people did. It says nothing about what borrowing cost them.
The distinction worth attention is not the growth rate but how interest is handled. A retirement interest-only mortgage is serviced monthly, and the ability to make those payments has to be assessed; a lifetime mortgage generally is not serviced that way. In a speech on 16 June 2026, the FCA’s director of retail banking, Emad Aladhal, said the regulator is consulting on retirement interest-only affordability and described a market he considers underdeveloped: of roughly 330,000 mortgages advanced to the over-55s in 2025, only 9 per cent were lifetime mortgages or retirement interest-only products.
So the reading we offer is the dull one. A quarterly total is a measurement of a market, not a signal about any household’s position in it. The document that answers the cost question is the illustration for the specific offer, read the way we have argued a personal loan should be read: total payable over time, not the monthly figure.
Loan Herald publishes; it does not lend, does not broker credit, is nobody’s appointed representative, and holds no permissions from the Financial Conduct Authority, which neither authorises nor regulates this title. Nothing above is advice, and any firm’s permissions are a question for the FCA Register rather than for us. If repayments are already difficult, free non-commercial help is available from MoneyHelper, Citizens Advice and StepChange.